Is global warming natural or human-caused?
After synthesizing the results of numerous studies and related data, Fig 2.10 shows the Earth’s energy budget under present-day conditions. The positive imbalance in the Earth’s energy budget is around 0.6 W/m2, which leads to global warming.
Why is there an imbalance in the Earth’s energy budget? Scientists use computer climate models to simulate the change in global surface temperature in the past hundred years. Fig 2.11 shows the simulation results of temperature anomaly (relative to the average of 1880-1919) under different situations.
There are significant differences between model simulations and actual observations and climate models would not be able to reproduce the observed warming if only natural factors such as the changes in the Earth’s orbit, solar activity and volcanic activity are considered. However, model simulations match with actual observations when both human and natural factors are considered, including the changes in greenhouse gas concentration, land use and man-made pollution.
The Fifth Assessment Report of IPCC clearly points out that it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
Radiative forcing
Scientists use the parameter “radiative forcing” to quantify the contribution of factors affecting global temperature. Positive radiative forcing indicates that the factor causes a positive imbalance in the Earth’s energy budget and hence warming of the Earth. Negative radiative forcing indicates that the factor causes a negative imbalance in the Earth’s energy budget and hence cooling of the Earth.
As shown in Fig 2.12, carbon dioxide has the highest positive radiative forcing, followed by methane. Human activities such as changing land uses and releasing aerosols to the atmosphere will cause an increase in albedo, leading to negative radiative forcing. The net human-caused radiative forcing is positive, far greater than the contribution of solar activities.
The 97% scientific consensus
Over the past 20 years, many studies examined the consensus on human-caused global warming among climate scientists. The scientific consensus was found to be between 90% and 100%.
In The Consensus Projectiv released in 2013, researchers examined the abstracts of more than 10,000 peer-reviewed scientific papers in the past 20 years and found 97% of the papers expressing a position endorsing the human-caused global warming assessment.
Source of figures and data in Chapter 7.2
[i] https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg1/observations-atmosphere-and-surface/fig2-11_orig-pptx-2/
[ii] www.skepticalscience.com/solar-activity-sunspots-global-warming.htm
[iii] https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/seaice/processes/albedo.html
[iv] https://www.hko.gov.hk/m/article_e.htm?title=ele_00246
[v] https://www.hko.gov.hk/climate_change/faq/faq_e.htm#Q201704
[vi] https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/box-ts-6-1024×608.jpg
[vii] https://scripps.ucsd.edu/programs/keelingcurve/
[viii] http://www.fao.org/resources/infographics/infographics-details/en/c/325836/
[ix] https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/Fig6-11-2-1024×793.jpg
[x] https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/Fig2-11-1-1024×673.jpg
[xi] https://archive.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/AR5_SYR_FINAL_All_Topics.pdf (P. 49)
[xii] https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/FigSPM-05.jpg